![]() ![]() Most of our clients already know that our fee is minimal compared to what the $124 ticket will cost them in the long run. “Why should I pay you to handle a Seattle traffic ticket that is $124?” “Grigoriy is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community.” – Michael Waddington, Military Law Attorney The Actual Cost of a Traffic Ticket in Seattle Our initial consultations are free and we will put our experience to use for you! CALL OUR SEATTLE TRAFFIC LAWYER AT (206) 409-7608 Your chances of winning your contesting hearing will increase dramatically with the help of a Seattle traffic lawyer. His observation of the violation will suffice. The officer does not have to provide any independent proof of your traffic violation. It will not matter what your speedometer read, that you think the officer could not have seen you, or that your grandma testifies that you never drive above the speed limit.ĭriver who decide to contest their Seattle traffic tickets without the help of a skillful Seattle traffic lawyer think that if it is their word against the officer’s, it will not be enough for the government to meet their burden of proof. If the officer’s report says he saw you driving at a certain speed, then the court will find that you were driving at that speed. It is very simple for you to lose your case if you attempt to handle your Seattle traffic ticket without the help of a Seattle speeding ticket lawyer. Many drivers who attempt to contest their Seattle traffic tickets without the help of a Seattle traffic lawyer, quickly get a hard lesson that it does not take much for the prosecutor to meet the preponderance of the evidence test. Another way to describe the “preponderance of the evidence standard is to apply the “more likely than not.” Is it more likely than not that the defendant committed the traffic infraction. It does not have to be much more than 50%. For criminal infractions the standard of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” It is a very high burden for the government to meet in order to convict a defendant.įor civil infractions, on the other hand, the standard of proof is “preponderance of the evidence.” It is commonly interpreted to mean that more than 50% of the evidence weighs against the defendant. Since civil infractions are less severe than criminal law violations, the standard of proof for the government to meet is a lot lower. ![]() This website and its contents are designed for a civil Seattle traffic ticket. For civil traffic infractions, the penalties are monetary and the defendant will not face jail time. In Washington State, traffic law violations could be criminal or civil. Standard of Proof for a Seattle Traffic Ticket
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |